Gemini 3 vs ChatGPT vs Claude: Which AI Performs Best for Everyday Tasks?

With Google releasing Gemini 3, the AI landscape has shifted again. But how does it stack up against ChatGPT and Claude, two of the most popular AI tools available? Whether you're coding, writing, researching, or studying, choosing the right AI can make all the difference. This guide breaks down how each model performs across five essential tasks: coding, writing, search, tutoring, and summarising.

Coding: Which AI is Best for Developers?

All three models offer strong coding capabilities, but they shine in different ways.

Gemini 3 stands out with its ability to handle long codebases thanks to its 1 million-token context window. Its "vibe coding" feature also makes it great for frontend prototyping and visual applications. However, these advanced features require a Google One AI Premium subscription.

ChatGPT (GPT-5) is excellent for clean, logical code generation and debugging. It includes tools like a code interpreter and can assist with both backend logic and user interface layout. Most capabilities are available for free, but power users may benefit from the Plus plan.

Claude 4, especially the Opus version, is ideal for complex coding tasks. It supports IDE integration with tools like VS Code and JetBrains and is well-suited for long refactors or deep technical projects. Sonnet 4 is free, while Opus 4 requires a paid plan.

Winner for Coding: Claude 4 (Opus) for depth, Gemini 3 for frontend and UI work, ChatGPT for general use and debugging.

Writing: Creativity, Clarity, and Control

Writing is where these AI models get truly expressive.

ChatGPT is often seen as the most versatile writing assistant. Whether it's crafting emails, blogs, poems, or essays, GPT-5 delivers coherent, nuanced text and can adapt to different tones and audiences. It's available to both free and Plus users.

Claude provides clean, structured writing. It excels in clarity and is ideal for analytical content or long-form writing that requires depth. Sonnet 4 offers top-tier performance for free users, while Opus 4 delivers the highest quality for professionals.

Gemini 3 handles formatted and multimodal writing well, particularly when visuals are involved. It also features generative interface tools that help with layout-heavy content, although these are locked behind a paywall.

Winner for Writing: ChatGPT for general and creative writing, Claude for structured analytical pieces, Gemini 3 for visual-heavy content.

Search: Real-Time Information and Accuracy

Access to up-to-date information is critical. Here’s how the models compare:

Gemini 3 benefits from Google’s vast infrastructure. It powers AI Overviews in Google Search and supports real-time facts, images, and even video-based knowledge. This is the most seamless search integration by far.

ChatGPT now includes a Search feature for Plus users and is rolling it out to free users. It provides current information with source links and context. It’s reliable but doesn’t pull in multimedia like Gemini.

Claude integrates with a web search tool that brings in current events and facts with citations. This is typically available through the API and paid versions.

Winner for Search: Gemini 3 for seamless and multimedia-rich integration.

Tutoring: Smart Help for Learners

Educational features are increasingly important in AI tools.

Gemini 3 includes a Guided Learning Mode built on LearnLM, which follows best practices for teaching. It uses Socratic questioning, offers step-by-step help, and can even suggest relevant YouTube videos. It’s available for free.

ChatGPT offers a Study Mode that guides users through questions step-by-step. It can adjust to the user’s level and avoids giving direct answers, helping students actually learn. Available to all users.

Claude also features a Learning Mode focused on understanding. It excels in prompting users with questions to build deeper knowledge. This approach is especially valuable for maintaining academic integrity.

Winner for Tutoring: Tie between ChatGPT and Gemini 3 for accessibility; Claude for academic depth.

Summarising: Handling Large Volumes of Text

Summarising complex content is a critical function for AI.

Claude stands out here with its ability to handle extremely long documents and provide detailed, nuanced summaries. This makes it ideal for research and professional reviews.

ChatGPT summarises well, especially when it comes to providing summaries tailored for different audiences. It tends to be concise and clear, though slightly narrower in scope compared to Claude.

Gemini 3 also benefits from its long context window and can summarise both text and image-based content. It’s well-suited for multimodal summarisation tasks.

Winner for Summarising: Claude 4 for thoroughness; Gemini 3 for mixed-media content.

Conclusion: Which AI Should You Choose?

Each AI model excels in different areas. Here’s a quick breakdown:

• Coding: Go with Claude 4 (Opus) for complex tasks, ChatGPT for general coding, and Gemini 3 for UI-heavy projects.

• Writing: ChatGPT is the best all-rounder, while Claude handles in-depth writing, and Gemini is good for visual outputs.

• Search: Gemini 3 leads with real-time, multimedia integration.

• Tutoring: All three are strong, but Gemini and ChatGPT are more accessible.

• Summarising: Claude offers the deepest insights, while Gemini supports more formats.

Ultimately, your best AI depends on your priorities. For coding or summarising, Claude’s Opus model is top-tier. For daily tasks, ChatGPT remains the most flexible. If you’re embedded in the Google ecosystem, Gemini 3 is worth exploring.

Explore each platform’s free version to see what works best for your workflow. Most offer enough functionality to get started before committing to a paid tier.